With limited federal requirements for block grants, states have developed very different welfare policies, often with onerous recertification or reporting requirements, creating barriers to continuous program enrollment. Examined through the framework of Administrative Burden, our study examines how changes to burdensome policies in states’ Child Care Development Fund (CCDF) programs affect the length of children’s continuous enrollment in child care through the CCDF program, known as subsidy “spells.” We exploit state-level changes in three key policies during a 10-year period (2004–13) that capture administrative burden: (1) length of eligibility redetermination; (2) reporting requirements for income changes; and (3) grace period for care before termination. (author abstract)
Keeping kids in care: Reducing administrative burden in state Child Care Development Fund policy
Description:
Resource Type:
Reports & Papers
Country:
United States
- Related Resources
Related resources include summaries, versions, measures (instruments), or other resources in which the current document plays a part. Research products funded by the Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation are related to their project records.
- Related Studies
- You May Also Like
These resources share similarities with the current selection.
States’ use of the Child Care and Development Block Grant funding increase: States’ uses of federal CCDBG funding increase to implement reauthorization requirements
Interactive Tools
States’ use of the Child Care and Development Block Grant funding increase: Use of federal CCDBG funding increase
Interactive Tools
States’ use of the Child Care and Development Block Grant funding increase: Challenges to implementing reauthorization goals and requirements
Interactive Tools