To review the second cohort of grantees to undergo DRS assessment and recompetition, we combined data on (1) grantees' characteristics; (2) their performance histories; (3) the DRS determinations as to which grantees had their grants automatically renewed and which were required to recompete, and (4) the outcomes of those recompetitions. We summarized the DRS determinations and recompetition results, and we compared grantees' DRS determinations to other, non-DRS performance data that ACF collects. Finally, we reviewed DRS determinations and recompetition outcomes for a subgroup of grantees that had lower performance on 10 selected measures than did their peers. (author abstract)