For each reauthorization requirement, state administrators reported whether a) the requirement was a priority for the new funds, b) the state was already meeting the requirement, or c) the requirement was a future priority (i.e., the state still needed additional funds or time in order to implement the requirement). The three most commonly reported uses of additional funds were to conduct comprehensive background checks for providers, reduce parental copayments, and provide pre-service health and safety training for all providers receiving a subsidy. (author abstract)
States’ use of the Child Care and Development Block Grant funding increase: States’ uses of federal CCDBG funding increase to implement reauthorization requirements
Description:
Resource Type:
Interactive Tools
Publisher(s):
Funder(s):
Country:
United States
State(s)/Territories/Tribal Nation(s):
Guam
- Related Resources
Related resources include summaries, versions, measures (instruments), or other resources in which the current document plays a part. Research products funded by the Office of Planning, Research, and Evaluation are related to their project records.
- You May Also Like
These resources share similarities with the current selection.
States’ use of the Child Care and Development Block Grant funding increase: Use of federal CCDBG funding increase
Interactive Tools
States’ use of the Child Care and Development Block Grant funding increase: Challenges to implementing reauthorization goals and requirements
Interactive Tools
States’ use of the Child Care and Development Block Grant funding increase: Increase in state funding for child care assistance
Interactive Tools